Free legitimate work at home jobs – 2012 legitimate work at home jobs, home of easy-to-Work Opportunities Work From Home opportunity
Free legitimate work at home jobs
question of funkypunkymonkey89 : Where can I find legitimate, free of fraud, work at home jobs like online surveys, etc.
I look forward to working from home do jobs such as online polls or something to findenLegitime stuff though, I do not want any scams / ads / viruses and all MistIch need jobs & money & a legitimate steady income / job (online surveys, installation and shipping them back to the company, writing jobs, etc.) Best Answer:
response from Bruce
Moneybooker you get up and walk / fly drive / to look like the rest of us to arbeiten.Es is not really a good source for what you asks. Most jobs advertised as “work from home” are scams. There are exceptions to every rule, but they are thin gesät.Von the jobs you mention, only writing job has any hope of working out. All you need to find a market for your letter and then a “freelance” writer.
Enter below your answer to this question!
“The election of Obama would, at a stroke, refresh the spirit of our country”
Year peak of Renegade98
STELLUNGNAHMEGuardian.co.uk | The Observer2. November 2008 “The election of Obama would, at a stroke, refresh the spirit of our country,” It was an epic campaign for the American presidency and one that was taken from the vicinity of the best writers in the U.S. on the New Yorker magazine, the motion – the nation’s leading magazine for politics and culture. Here, in its leader column before the election, provide the editors of the magazine a brilliant analysis of the choice facing America, deconstruct the strengths and weaknesses of the candidates and end up with an efficient support of Barack Obama as the man to answer best suited to serious challenges of the next president has never in living memory has an election been more critical than the one fast approaching – this is the four-yearly cliché, as expected as different as the balloons and the bombast. And yet when has it ever so urgently true? When so many Americans had so clear a sense that a Presidency has – at the levels of competence, vision and integrity – undermined the country and its ideals, the current government has made for eternity. The Presidency of George W. Bush is the worst since Reconstruction, so there is no mystery about why the Republican Party – which has dominion over the executive branch of the federal government for the past eight years and the legislature for most of the time instead – has little interest in his record of defending domestic or foreign. The only speaker at the convention in St. Paul who uttered more than a sentence or two in support of the President was his wife, Laura. Meanwhile, playing the candidate, John McCain, who is part of a vaudeville illusionist, asking, as an apostle of change after years of the essentials of the Bush agenda with ever greater enthusiasm embraced anzusehen.Der Republican disaster begins at home. Even before taking into account what fantastic expensive plan eventually emerges to rescue the financial system from Wall Street, long-running pyramid schemes, the economic and financial policy picture is bleak. During the Bush administration has the national debt, now approaching almost doubled trillion. The next year the federal budget is projected to a projected deficit 0BN, a steep decline in the surpluses that 0BN, when Bill Clinton was running out of office. Private sector job creation is one sixth of what it was under President Clinton. Five million people have fallen into poverty. The number of Americans without health insurance has risen from seven million, while average premiums have nearly doubled. Meanwhile, the most important domestic achievement was the Bush administration to shift the relative tax burden from the rich to the rest for the top 1 percent of us are the Bush tax cuts worth an average of about a thousand dollars a week, for the bottom fifth, about a dollar and a half. The unfairness will only increase if the painful but necessary effort to land to rescue the credit markets preventing the rescue of our health care system, our environment and our physical, educational and industrial Infrastruktur.Zugleich are 150 000 American soldiers in Iraq and 33,000 in Afghanistan. There is still disagreement about the wisdom of overthrowing Saddam Hussein and his horrific regime, but it is no longer the slightest doubt that the Bush Administration manipulated, bullied and lied to, manages the American public into this war and its so bad in law enforcement almost every aspect. The direct costs, besides an expenditure of more than 0BN, in the loss of more than 4,000 Americans, the wounding of 30,000, the deaths of tens of thousands of Iraqis and the displacement of four and a half million men, women and children included. Only now, after American forces have for a year to fight more than they did in the Second World War, there is a glimmer of hope that the conflict in Iraq has a stage of fragile stability eingetragen.Die indirect costs, both the war in particular, and by the administration unilateralism in foreign policy in general, were also immense. The torture of prisoners, authorized at the highest level, has an ethical and a public diplomacy disaster. At a moment when the global environment, the global economy and global stability require a transition to new energy sources, the United States has declined worldwide, in wasteful consumption and heedless in its policy. Strategically and morally, the Bush administration has squandered the American capacity to meet, the example and the swagger of its rivals. China, Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and other illiberal states have concluded, each in his own way, that the democratic principles and human rights must be components of a stable, prosperous future. At the last meeting of the United Nations, was encouraged despots like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran in the city mock our predicament and hailing the “end of the American era.” The election of 2008 is the first in more than half a century in which no incumbent President or Vice-President is on the ballot. However, there is a ruling party and the party is lucky to find himself, apparently against the wishes of his “base” with a candidate who did not like George W. Bush apparently before it was fashionable to do so. In South Carolina, in 2000, Bush crushed John McCain with a sub rosa primary campaign of such viciousness that McCain lashed out memorably against Bush’s Christian right allies. McCain’s anger was so deep that he flirted in 2004 with the possibility of joining the Democratic ticket under John Kerry. Bush, who took office as a “compassionate conservative,” governed immediately as a rightist ideologue. During this first term, McCain reinforces his reputation, sometimes deserved, as “outliers” ready to work with the Democrats on issues such as the normalization of relations with Vietnam, campaign finance reform and immigration reform. He is co-sponsored, with John Edwards and Edward Kennedy, a patients bill of rights. In the years 2001 and 2003 he was voting against the Bush tax cuts. With John Kerry, he a bill raising auto fuel efficiency standards as a co-sponsor, with Joseph Lieberman, a cap-and-trade regime on carbon emissions. He was one of a minority of Republicans unlimited as opposed to drilling for oil and gas from America’s Küsten.Seit the 2004 election, however, McCain has moved relentlessly to the right in his quest for the Republican nomination. He paid obeisance to preacher Jerry Falwell and his ilk. He made immigration reform, eventually coming out against his own law. Most shocking was McCain who had repeatedly condemned torture in all circumstances, in February against a ban on the very techniques of “enhanced interrogation methods” that he once endured in Vietnam – as long as the torturers were civilians from the CIA beschäftigt.Auf almost every issue, McCain and the Democratic Party nominee, Barack Obama, speak the language of generalized “reform,” but only Obama has provided a convincing, rational, and fully developed vision available. McCain’s opposition to the Bush-era tax cuts and has taken over abandoned the demagogic call – in the midst of recession and Wall Street calamity, with looming crises in Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid – for further tax cuts. Bush’s expire in 2011. If McCain, as he has proposed, cuts taxes for businesses and real estate, the benefits once a disproportionately go to the Washington Wohlhabenden.In enthusiasm for pure market triumphalism is over. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson arrived in town (via Goldman Sachs) a Republican, but it seems that he left to a Democrat. In other words, he has come to see that the abuses that led to the current financial crisis – not least, excessive speculation on borrowed capital – can be fixed only with government regulation and oversight can. McCain, who has never expressed much interest in or knowledge of, economic questions, has little substance to had to say about the crisis. Expose a melodramatic appeal to his campaign and postpone the first presidential debate until the government bailout plan was ready – – His most notable gesture of concern proved soon as empty Ablenkungsmanöver.Im contrast, Obama has a serious study of the mechanics and history this economic disaster and the possibility of fostering a recovery made. Records last March in New York, in a speech by its depth, balance and vision, he said: “A complete disdain for pay-as-you-go budgeting, coupled with a generally scornful attitude towards oversight and enforcement, allowed far too many who are implementing short-term profit before long-term consequences. “Obama is to reform, some have not only committed to the restoration of stability but also the protection of the vast majority of the population who do not have the fruits of the binge years. He has called for a stronger and more programmatic regulation of the financial system and the creation of a National Infrastructure Reinvestment Bank that contribute to the decay of our roads, bridges and mass transit systems and millions of jobs would be created, and a great investment in the green-Energiesektor.Zum on energy and global warming, Obama offers a series of violent proposals. He supports a cap-and-trade program to the United States carbon dioxide emissions by 80 percent to reduce by 2050 – an enormously ambitious goal, but one that many people say climate researchers must be met, atmospheric carbon dioxide, it can be kept below disastrous levels . Acquire large emitters, such as utilities, would be carbon allowances, and those that emit less carbon dioxide than their allotment could the resulting credits to those who emit more to sell, over time, which would reduce the available certificates. Significantly, Obama wants to auction the allowances, this would billion per year for developing alternative energy sources and creating job-training in green technology. He wants also to increase federal fuel economy standards and to require that 10 percent of U.S. electricity from renewable energy sources by 2012 be generated. Taken together, the most coherent and far-sighted strategy of his proposals was ever angeboten.Es of a presidential candidate to reduce the nation’s dependence on fossil fuels, have cause to hope that McCain and Obama would be a sensible debate about energy and climate policies have. McCain was one of the first Republicans in the Senate to support federal limits on carbon dioxide, and he has announced his own support for a less ambitious cap-and-trade program as evidence of his independence from the White House. But, as polls showed Americans growing nervousness about gasoline prices, McCain apparently found it useful in this area to also move on track. He took a dubious idea – lifting the federal moratorium on offshore oil drilling – and laid him in the center of his campaign. The opening of the U.S. coastal waters have drilling does not affect gasoline prices in the short term and long term, the, effect, according to a recent analysis by the Department of Energy, would be “insignificant.” Such inconvenient facts, however, are waved through a campaign that finally found its voice with the slogan “Drill, baby, drill!” The contrast between the candidates is even sharper with respect to the third branch of government. An uneasy equilibrium exists at present among the judges of the Supreme Court, where four hard-core conservatives before, against four moderate liberals. Anthony Kennedy M is the Swing Vote, in determining the outcome of the case after Chief Justice John Roberts called anderen.McCain and Justice Samuel Alito, two reliable conservatives, as models for his own future appointments. If he means what he says and if he replaces even one moderate on the current Supreme Court, then Roe v. Wade is reversed, and states are again allowed to impose absolute bans on abortion. McCain’s views have hardened on this issue. In 1999, he said he opposed overturning Roe; of 2006, he was saying that his end ‘would not bother me none’; of 2008, he is no longer supported adding rape and incest as exceptions to his party’s platform against Abtreibung.Aber scrapping Roe – which would eventually leave as free states permit abortion as to criminalize it – would be just the beginning. Given the ideological agenda that the existing conservative bloc has pursued, it is safe to predict that affirmative action of all kinds would likely be prohibited by a McCain Court. The efforts of the executive branch who have tried in recent years, certain noble judges, to resist, to expand would likely increase. Falling barriers between church and state would, executions would rise, legal control of corporate power would wither away – all with just one new conservative candidate in the square. And the next president will probably vorzunehmen.Obama three appointments, the Constitutional Law at the University of Chicago is taught, not only voted against Roberts and Alito but also several unqualified lower court nominations confirmed. As an Illinois state senator, he won the support of prosecutors and police organizations for new protections against the conviction of the innocent in capital cases. While McCain continues to deny habeas corpus rights to detainees, perpetuating the Bush administration took the regime of state-sponsored extra-judicial detention Obama the opposite side, pushing to restore the right of all U.S. prisoners to a hearing. The judicial future would be in his care sicher.In the shorthand of political commentary, the Iraq war seems to leave McCain and Obama as well. Opposing it before the invasion, Obama had the foresight to warn of a costly and indefinite occupation and rising anti-American radicalism around the world, supporting it, McCain did nothing about it. More recently, in the spring of 2007, McCain risked his Presidential prospects on the proposition that five additional combat brigades could be a war that by then appeared hopeless to save. Obama, along with much of the country, had decided that it is time for American losses were limited. None of the candidates, the calculations on Iraq have as cheap as a political statement McCain repeated that Obama values his career was his country, the two men based their positions, right or wrong, on judgment and Bush’s successor will inherit two wars Prinzip.Präsident and the realities of limited resources, flagging popular will, and the dwindling possibilities of what can be achieved by American power. McCain’s views on these subjects range from the simplistic to the unknown. In Iraq, he seeks “victory” – a word that General David Petraeus refuses to use, and one that fundamentally distorts the messy, open nature of the conflict. As for Afghanistan, on the rare occasions when he mentioned McCain, it implies that the surge protector directly from Iraq, which means that his understanding is not the insurgency as hard as he was during the first debate of the presidential candidates insisted proposed transfer. McCain always displays more faith in force than interest in its strategic consequences. Unlike Obama, McCain has no political strategy for either war, only the dubious hope that greater security makes things work out. Obama has long been a deterioration along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border and has warned a feel for his as crucial. His strategy for Afghanistan and Iraq shows an understanding of the role that internal politics, economics, corruption, and regional diplomacy play in wars where there is no victory taught the Schlachtfeld.Unvorstellbar painful personal experience that McCain war in particular an examination The honor is to: maintain the will to fight, willing to risk everything and you will prevail. To outline posed in the first debate, “the lessons of Iraq,” McCain said, “I think the lessons of Iraq are very clear: that you will not have a failed strategy, which then cause you to lose almost a conflict. ” A soldier’s life answer – but a statesman must have a broader view of war and peace. The years ahead will demand not only determination but also diplomacy, flexibility, patience, prudence and intellectual engagement. This is not McCain’s strong suit than the current president of the. Obama, for his part seems to know that more than willpower and force to extract an advantage from the wreckage of the Bush years is erforderlich.Obama better suited for the task of renewing the foundations foundations of American influence. An American restoration in foreign policy requires a commitment not only to international cooperation, but also to international institutions that can address global warming, the dislocations of what is likely to be a deepening global economic crisis, epidemics, nuclear proliferation, terrorism and other be, more traditional security challenges. Many of the Cold War era vehicles for engagement and negotiation – the United Nations, the World Bank, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty regime, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization – are moribund, tattered, or outdated. Should be compressed Obama has the generational change that is needed to revive Outlook or to reinvent them. He would be the first postwar American President unencumbered by the legacies of either Munich or Vietnam sein.Der next president must also re-American moral credibility. Closing Guantanamo, torture and the prohibition of termination of the Iraq war as responsibly as possible will be globally a start, but just that the modern presidency as a vehicle for communication as for decision-making and the relevant target groups. Obama has inspired many Americans in part because he is a mirror of their own idealism. His election would do no less – and probably more – is different in Übersee.Was most of the candidates, however, is character – and here, contrary to conventional wisdom, Obama is clearly the stronger of the two. Not long ago, said Rick Davis, McCain campaign manager: “. Not this election is about issues this election is about a composite view of what the people from these candidates take.” The view that this election is about personalities from politics leaves, complexity and responsibility. Nevertheless, there is some truth in what Davis said – but it hardly suggests the conclusion that he beabsichtigte.In according to Obama, McCain has made “change” one of his campaign mantras. But the change he has provided has been in itself and it is not just a matter of changing its position. The willingness to pander and even lie has come to define his campaign and its televised advertisements. A contemptuous duplicity, a meanness, has entered his talk on the stump – so much so that it seems obvious that in the drive for victory, he is ready, some of the same underhanded methods that defeated him eight years ago in South Carolina replicate is. Perhaps nothing revealed McCain’s cynicism about his choice of Sarah Palin, former mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, who had been governor of this state for 21 months, as the Republican candidate for Vice-President. In the interviews she has given since her nomination, she has difficulties encountered improvised coherent answers about the fundamental issues of the day had. We observe a candidate for Vice-President cram for her ongoing exam in elementary domestic and foreign policy. This is funny as a Tina Fey routine on Saturday Night Live, but as a vision of the political future, it is deeply disturbing. Palin has no business to be the backup to a President of any age, let alone one who is 72 and in imperfect health. In choosing her McCain committed an act of breathtaking heedlessness and irresponsibility. Obama’s choice, Joe Biden, is not without flaws. His tongue sometimes runs in advance of his mind, providing his own fodder for late-night comedians, but there is no comparison with Palin. His deep experience in foreign policy making, judicial and social policy to assure him, and complementary partner for Obama.Je longer the campaign goes on, the more the issues of personality and character in a bad light against McCain. Unless appearances are very deceiving, he is impulsive, impatient, self-dramatizing, erratic, and a compulsive risk-taker. These qualities may have contributed to his usefulness as an “outlier” Senator. But in a President they would be opposed to a threat sein.Im will accompany Obama’s transformative message of a sense of pragmatic calm. A tropism for unity is an essential part of his character and his campaign. It is part of what allows him a Democratic opponent to overcome the entered the race with tremendous advantages. It is what helped him forge a political career, both on the liberals of Hyde Park and on the political Stammtisch downtown Chicago. His policy preferences are distinctly liberal, but he is determined to a broad spectrum of Americans who do not share his opinion, or any value strictly speaking. For some who oppose him, his equanimity seems to be under the ugliest attacks such arrogance, for some who support him, seems his reluctance in the same vein counterattack as self-destructive Ablösung.Doch it is Obama’s temperament – and not McCain – who to look for the office both men and for the volatile and dangerous time in which we live seems. Those who dismiss his centeredness as self-centeredness or his composure as indifference as wrong as those who mistook Eisenhower’s apathy for density or Lincoln’s humor for lack of seriousness sind.Inzwischen almost all politicians, who thinks about running president, agreed to an author to be. Obama’s books are different: he wrote them. The Audacity of Hope (2006) is a series of political essays loosely around an account of his first year in the Senate of the United States aufgebaut.Obwohl a manifesto of sorts campaign, it is better than the usual blowsy pastiche of genre a ghostwriter wrote speeches . But it is Obama’s first book, Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance (1995), which provides an unprecedented insight into the mind and heart of a potential president. Obama began writing it in his early thirties, before he was a candidate for anything. Not since Theodore Roosevelt, an American politician has produced so close to the summit of power, such as a sustained, highly personal work of literary merit before being definitively not gefegt.Eine by the tides of political ambition presidential election, the awarding of a Pulitzer Price: we elect a politician and, we hope, a statesman, not a writer. But Obama’s first book is in the way that it is his fundamental attitudes of mind and spirit reveals valuable. Dreams from My Father is a lighting device memoir not only in the substance of his own peculiarly American Obama’s story but also in the qualities he brings to the telling: a formidable intelligence, emotional empathy, self-reflection, balance, and a remarkable ability to see life and the world through the eyes of people very different from themselves. As with nearly all other senators and governors of his generation, Obama does not count military service as part of his biography. But his life was full of tests – personal, spiritual, racial, political – that bear on his preparation for the big Verantwortung.Es perfectly legitimate to make them pay attention, as McCain has done to Obama’s lack of conventional national and international political decision-making experience. Also, we wish he had more of it. But office-holding is not the only kind of experience needed for the task of leading a wildly colorful nation. Obama’s immersion in diverse human environments (Hawaii racial rainbow, Chicago’s racial boiler, countercultural New York, middle-class Kansas, predominantly Muslim Indonesia), his years of organizing among the poor, his taste of corporate law and his grounding in public interest and constitutional law – even these are experiences. And his books show that he wrung from them every drop of insight and breadth of perspective they enthalten.Der tiring, sometimes provocative, long campaign in 2008 (and 2007) had at least one virtue: It has been shown that Obama’s intelligence and Temperament is not stable, only figments of the writer crafts. He has made mistakes, to be sure. (His failure to accept McCain’s imaginative proposal for a series of unmediated joint appearances was among them.), But was marked on the whole, his campaign by patience, planning, discipline, organization, technological expertise and strategic astuteness. Obama has often two or three moves ahead, relatively impervious to the permanent hysteria saw the hourly news cycle and the Cable News Schreier. And when crisis has struck, as it did when the divisive antics threatened his ex-pastor to plunge took his campaign, he has proved equal to the moment, life with even a speech that not only drew the poison but also demonstrated a have tried deep respect for the Wählerschaft.Obwohl his opponents attack him as a man of “mere” words, Obama has returned eloquence to its essential place in American politics. The choice between experience and eloquence is wrong – something that Lincoln, out of office after one term in Congress, proved in his own campaign of political and national renewal. Obama’s “mere” speeches on everything from the economy have to race and foreign policy have been the centerpiece of his campaign and his success if he wins, his eloquence will be central to its ability to regieren.Wir can not expect a man, to heal wounds, to solve every major crisis of policy.
Video Rating: 0/5